On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:08:33AM -0400, Guido Günther wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:05:56AM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote: > > It appears that this patch was applied (in commit > > 45616162db2d1e807dbe70e60c67cb701cbd06d8) with the virDomainIsActive(vm) > > checks removed from qemudDomainCreate, such that we fail out with > > "domain [...] is already defined and running" even if the domain is only > > defined but not running. > The error message is confusing. I missed to correct that. Shall I send a > patch? I thing doing more than that is simply too confusing for users.
No, no problem, Charles was being confused :-) all set now ! Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
