Re: [libvirt] sexpr.c: reviving an old const-correct change

Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:25:41 -0700 

Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   Looks fine too, +1

Ta.  Pushed.

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to