On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:03 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Out of interest, do you ever hit the 16 bit limit in the size of > compiled regexps? The "bytecode" used to represent compiled GNU > regexps has (or perhaps had) a 16 bit limit in the jump offsets, which > I hit a few years back. Had to switch to using a flex-compiled > pattern matcher in the end.
No, I haven't run into that. Was that with the 'old' GNU regex implementation (before ~ 2002) or with the current one ? David -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
