On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:43:41AM -0700, Yushu Yao wrote: > Thanks Daniel, > > > Now support for local virtualization (QEmu for example) would be a more > > complex issue but probably not much more complex than existing linux > > hypervisor support. > Why is this more complex? Could you please explain a bit more?
Because that's code which would have to be designed/ported, instead of just recompiling completely generic code which has already been ported to Windows. > By the way, with libvirt, can I control a hypervisor without the libvirtd > running with root privilege (or even without libvirtd running at all?)? You should not assume this is possible. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
