On 08/12/14 17:17, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On 08/12/2014 03:44 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> Check that secdef->imagelabel exists before blindly applying it.
>> ---
>>  src/security/security_selinux.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/security/security_selinux.c 
>> b/src/security/security_selinux.c
>> index c078cab..cf59d6c 100644
>> --- a/src/security/security_selinux.c
>> +++ b/src/security/security_selinux.c
>> @@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ 
>> virSecuritySELinuxSetSavedStateLabel(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr 
>> ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>>      virSecurityLabelDefPtr secdef;
>>
>>      secdef = virDomainDefGetSecurityLabelDef(def, SECURITY_SELINUX_NAME);
>> -    if (!secdef || !secdef->relabel)
>> +    if (!secdef || !secdef->imagelabel || !secdef->relabel)
>>          return 0;
>>
>>      return virSecuritySELinuxSetFilecon(savefile, secdef->imagelabel);
>>
> 
> I think this is just covers up incorrect usage of this function on shutoff
> domains, because if a running domain has a selinux label, it should have the
> imagelabel generated.

Fair enough. I'll drop this one.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to