On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:29:05AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/15/2014 01:46 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:54:51AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:On 09/08/2014 07:40 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mklet...@redhat.com> ---+ <ref name="virSwitch"/>Purely cosmetic, but how about calling them "virYesNo" and "virOnOff" to avoid confusion? When I see "virBool" I think "true/false", and when I see "virSwitch" I think "Does this have something to do with a network device?" :-)That's another way (and makes more sense). I just wanted to shorten the "Tristate" since it's not a tristate anyway. Should I count it as an ACK for s/virSwitch/virOnOff/ and s/virBool/virYesNo/ ?Yes, I'll agree to that rename.
There were more things to be changed, so I sent a completely new version with this changed: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-September/msg00894.html Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
