On 14.10.2014 09:42, Cole Robinson wrote:
It's supported on aarch64 and armv7l as well, so just drop the restriction
entirely since it doesn't add much.
---
src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
index 8cb0865..2872e47 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
@@ -7672,14 +7672,6 @@ qemuBuildDomainLoaderCommandLine(virCommandPtr cmd,
break;
case VIR_DOMAIN_LOADER_TYPE_PFLASH:
- /* UEFI is supported only for x86_64 currently */
- if (def->os.arch != VIR_ARCH_X86_64) {
I think it would be better to deliberately allow arches we want. As far
as I understand the cmd line generated to use UEFI can vary depending on
the guest architecture, is that right Laszlo? If it is so, ACK to the
opposite patch :)
- virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
- _("pflash is not supported for %s guest
architecture"),
- virArchToString(def->os.arch));
- goto cleanup;
- }
-
if (!virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DRIVE)) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
_("this QEMU binary doesn't support -drive"));
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
