On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 01:13:18AM +0000, David Lutterkort wrote: > * Should this even be done as part of libvirt ? It seems like a very > generic network config tool, and libvirt merely the conduit to exposing > this through an API, most importantly, a remotable API.
My humble opinion would be "no". This argument equally applies to everything you could configure on a host, and I don't think anyone wants to turn libvirt into libmanagement. Would it be feasible for libvirtd to have a 'passthrough' mode that feeds unknown stuff off to some other daemon? Especially in this case - interface management is very complex as you note. regards john -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
