On 05/14/2015 07:57 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 17:08:53 +0800, Luyao Huang wrote:
As we have a new device address type 'dimm', add
some document and an example to our docs.
Signed-off-by: Luyao Huang <lhu...@redhat.com>
---
docs/formatdomain.html.in | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
index e0b6ba7..0e908a1 100644
--- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
@@ -2876,6 +2876,13 @@
attributes: <code>iobase</code> and <code>irq</code>.
<span class="since">Since 1.2.1</span>
</dd>
+ <dt><code>type='dimm'</code></dt>
+ <dd>DIMM addresses, for memory device, have the following additional
+ attributes: <code>slot</code> (a value between 0 and 4294967295,
+ inclusive), and <code>base</code> (a hex value between 0 and
+ 0xffffffffffffffff, inclusive).
+ <span class="since">Since 1.2.14</span>
The values for the DIMM address shouldn't really be documented. I'd
rather state that the values are determined automatically and the user
should not need to touch them.
Oh, i see, i will remove the value for DIMM address and add some mention
about the values.
Thanks for your quick review.
Peter
Luyao
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
