On 05/23/2015 02:45 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 08:05:23PM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: >> Build with gcc 4.8 fails with:
Arguably a bug in gcc; but since we can work around it without too much
pain, we should.
>>
>> bhyve/bhyve_monitor.c: In function 'bhyveMonitorIO':
>> bhyveMonitorIO(int watch, int kq, int events ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, void
>> *opaque)
>> {
>> - const struct timespec zerowait = {};
>> + const struct timespec zerowait = { 0, 0 };
Would also be sufficient to do 'zerowait = { 0 };' - any C compiler that
warns about an initializer of { 0 } is broken, because that is THE
idiomatic way to zero-initialize anything (scalar or structure)
according to C99.
>
> You "need" to set at least minimum one field, all others will be set
> to 0. But this is of course very right thing to do.
>
> ACK, structures shouldn't be initialized this way.
Go ahead and push as you have it, though, with two members, since we
know struct timespec has (at least) two members.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
