Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdene...@redhat.com>
---
src/cpu/cpu_map.xml | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml
index c21c7e0..22c7928 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml
@@ -374,8 +374,25 @@
</model>
<model name='pentium3'>
- <model name='pentium2'/>
+ <feature name='cmov'/>
+ <feature name='cx8'/>
+ <feature name='de'/>
+ <feature name='fpu'/>
+ <feature name='fxsr'/>
+ <feature name='mca'/>
+ <feature name='mce'/>
+ <feature name='mmx'/>
+ <feature name='msr'/>
+ <feature name='mtrr'/>
+ <feature name='pae'/>
+ <feature name='pat'/>
+ <feature name='pge'/>
+ <feature name='pse'/>
+ <feature name='pse36'/>
+ <feature name='sep'/>
<feature name='sse'/>
+ <feature name='tsc'/>
+ <feature name='vme'/>
</model>
<model name='pentiumpro'>
--
2.4.4
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
