Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdene...@redhat.com>
---
src/cpu/cpu_map.xml | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml
index 73b0d8d..66cf2ee 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml
@@ -742,9 +742,38 @@
</model>
<model name='Nehalem'>
- <model name='Penryn'/>
+ <vendor name='Intel'/>
+ <feature name='apic'/>
+ <feature name='clflush'/>
+ <feature name='cmov'/>
+ <feature name='cx16'/>
+ <feature name='cx8'/>
+ <feature name='de'/>
+ <feature name='fpu'/>
+ <feature name='fxsr'/>
+ <feature name='lahf_lm'/>
+ <feature name='lm'/>
+ <feature name='mca'/>
+ <feature name='mce'/>
+ <feature name='mmx'/>
+ <feature name='msr'/>
+ <feature name='mtrr'/>
+ <feature name='nx'/>
+ <feature name='pae'/>
+ <feature name='pat'/>
+ <feature name='pge'/>
+ <feature name='pni'/>
<feature name='popcnt'/>
+ <feature name='pse'/>
+ <feature name='pse36'/>
+ <feature name='sep'/>
+ <feature name='sse'/>
+ <feature name='sse2'/>
+ <feature name='sse4.1'/>
<feature name='sse4.2'/>
+ <feature name='ssse3'/>
+ <feature name='syscall'/>
+ <feature name='tsc'/>
</model>
<model name='Westmere'>
--
2.4.4
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
