On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:25:28PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Christophe Fergeau > <cferg...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Looks good to me, I'd name the type GVirNetworkDhcpLease rather than > > GVirNetworkDHCPLease, this is consistent with > > GVirConfigCapabilitiesCpuModel (and not CPUModel). > > Hm.. I was trying to keep it consistent with the underlying > 'virNetworkDHCPLease'.
I agree - IMHO acronyms should always be capitalized in our APIs - use of Cpu is a bug (which we can't fix), but we should not add more of such bugs. Likewise MAC, rather than Mac Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
