... >>> @@ -18914,6 +18941,12 @@ virDomainControllerDefFormat(virBufferPtr buf, >>> if (def->opts.pciopts.chassisNr != -1) >>> virBufferAsprintf(buf, " chassisNr='%d'", >>> def->opts.pciopts.chassisNr); >>> + if (def->opts.pciopts.chassis != -1) >>> + virBufferAsprintf(buf, " chassis='%d'", >>> + def->opts.pciopts.chassis); >>> + if (def->opts.pciopts.port != -1) >>> + virBufferAsprintf(buf, " port='0x%x'", >>> + def->opts.pciopts.port); >> OH... And this is what I get for not reading ahead... So now my previous >> comments are unfounded... <sigh> > > Which comments are those? There was a comment in a previous patch about > not needing the boolean "pciTarget" that wasn't valid, but your comments > about the range were certainly valid. >
In patch 7 I indicated it wasn't necessary to have multiple lines and the whole thing could be formatted in one line (when just chassisNr existed).... But with adding more attributes, that's no longer valid. John -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
