On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:22:10PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 26.08.2015 17:53, Laine Stump wrote:<snip/>How about this: give virNetlinkDelLink() a new argument "fallbackDeleteFunc" which would either be NULL, or a pointer to virNetDevBridgeDeleteWithIoctl() (in this case)? That avoids needing to split virNetlinkDelLink into multiple parts as well as the duplication of code, and I think it's much less obtuse than the boolean thing of V1.D'oh! I mean, if someone calls virNetlink*() he can assume that the function will talk to kernel via netlink. This would break the assumption. But I because I am unable to come up with a better idea, I think it's our best option.
As hacky as the previous one, but at least clean and understandable, in my opinion.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
