On 09/01/2015 02:11 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 08/31/2015 04:06 PM, Jonathan Toppins wrote:
On 08/31/2015 03:25 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 04:19:10PM -0400, Jonathan Toppins wrote:
Adds a new interface type using UDP sockets, this seems only applicable
to QEMU but have edited tree-wide to support the new interface type.

The interface type required the addition of a "localaddr" (local
address), this then maps into the following xml and qemu call.

<interface type='udp'>


Sine we do have

      <interface type='mcast'>

already wouldn't it be better to have something like

       <interface type='ucast' protocol='udp'>


This possibly could be better, my concern would be now tcp is
configured differently than udp, no? Or are you saying something like:

    <interface type='ucast' protocol='udp|tcp'>

I think the case of a tcp connection is already handled by <interface
type='client'> and <interface type='server'> together, so that doesn't
seem likely to happen. I suppose it's possible someone would come up
with an sctp-based transport in the future though. I'm undecided about
this.

I am willing to work with Guido if you have some time to put into it. Otherwise the current implementation <interface type="foo"> models are pretty much 1:1 representations of what is in the C code and this looks pretty extensible to me. Have not seen any (or very few) copy-and-paste sections of code so it seems to be holding up currently. I will not try and speak for supporting the xml configuration long term, would appreciate some other perspectives. Lacking this I leave it up to the maintainer(s) to determine if this is worthy to go in. I see v1.2.19-rc2 has been put out there so a possible compromise (policy even?) is for this to go into v1.2.20-devel so people can play around with it. I assume implementations can be changed/reverted between releases v1.2.19 to v1.2.20. Completely understand the concern about supporting an interface for ever :)

Regards,
-Jon

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to