On 03.09.2015 22:47, John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 09/02/2015 11:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> From: Lin Ma <l...@suse.com> >> >> Format & output more detailed information about networked source >> >> e.g: The output without the patch: >> $ virsh domblklist $DOMAIN --details >> Type Device Target Source >> ------------------------------------------------ >> network disk vda test-pool/image >> network disk vdb iqn.2015-08.org.example:sn01/0 >> network disk vdc /image.raw >> network disk vdd - >> network disk vde - >> network disk vdf image1 >> network disk vdg test-volume/image.raw >> >> The output with the patch: >> $ virsh domblklist $DOMAIN --details >> Type Device Target Source >> ------------------------------------------------ >> network disk vda >> rbd://monitor1.example.org:6321/test-pool/image >> network disk vdb >> iscsi://192.168.124.200:3260/iqn.2015-08.org.example:sn01/0 >> network disk vdc http://192.168.124.200:80/image.raw >> network disk vdd nbd+unix:///var/run/nbdsock >> network disk vde nbd://192.168.124.200:12345 >> network disk vdf sheepdog://192.168.124.200:6000/image1 >> network disk vdg >> gluster://192.168.124.200/test-volume/image.raw > > Is the goal to just format in some "standard" format or to use the > format that would be used by qemu in the command line?
While it's the former, I think we should at least cover asses and document that these strings have no special meaning and can change later if we find a better way of expressing them. Or should we? Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
