On 10/29/2015 12:49 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
For a guest domain defined with a large number of macvtap devices, it takes an 
exceedingly long time to boot the guest. In a test of a guest domain configured 
with 82 macvtap devices, it took over two minutes for the guest to boot. An 
strace of the ioctl calls during guest start up showed the SIOCGIFFLAGS ioctl 
literally being invoked 3,403 times. I was able to isolate the source of the 
ioctl calls to the*virNetDevMacVLanCreateWithVPortProfile*  function 
in*virnetdevmacvlan.c*. The macvtap interface name is created by looping over a 
counter variable, starting with zero, and appending the counter value to 
'macvtap'.

I've wondered ever since the first time I saw that code why it was done that way, and why there had never been any performance complaints. Lacking any complaints, I promptly forgot about it (until the next time I went past the code for some other tangentially related reason.)

Since you're the first to complain, you have the honor of fixing it :-)

With each iteration, a call is made to*virNetDevExists*  (SIOCGIFFLAGS ioctl) 
to determine if a device with that name already exists, until a unique name is 
created. In the test case cited above, to create an interface name for the 82nd 
macvtap device, the*virNetDevExists*  function will be called for interface 
names 'macvtap0' to 'macvtap80' before it is determined that 'mavtap81' can be 
used. So if N is the number of macvtap interfaces defined for a guest, the 
SIOCGIFFLAGS ioctl will be invoked (N x N + N)/2 times to find an unused 
macvtap device names. That's assuming only one guest is being started, who 
knows how many times the ioctl may have to be called in an installation running 
a large number of guests defined with macvtap devices.

I was able to reduce the amount of time for starting a guest domain defined 
with 82 macvtap devices from over 2 minutes to about 14 seconds by keeping 
track of the interface name suffixes previously used. I defined two static bit 
maps (virBitmap), one each for macvtap and macvlan device name suffixes. When a 
macvtap/macvlan device is created, the index of the next clear bit 
(virBitmapNextClearBit) is retrieved to create the name. If an interface with 
that name does not exist, the device is created and the bit at the index used 
to create the interface name is set (virBitmapSetBit). When a macvtap/macvlan 
device is deleted, if the interface name has the pattern 'macvtap%d' or 
'macvlan%d', the suffix is parsed into a bit index and used to clear the 
(virBitMapClearBit) bit in the respective bitmap.

This sounds fine, as long as 1) you recreate the bitmap whenever libvirtd is restarted (while scanning through all the interfaces of every domain; there is already code being executed in exactly the right place - look for qemu_process.c:qemuProcessNotifyNets() and add appropriate code inside the loop there), and 2) you retry some number of times if a supposedly unused device name is actually in use (to account for processes other than libvirt using the same naming convention).


I am not sure that is the best design because there is no way to track 
interface names used to create macvtap devices outside of libvirt, for example 
using the ip command.

If you wanted to get *really* complicated, you could use netlink to get a list of all network devices, or even monitor netlink traffic to maintain your own cache, but I think that's serious overkill (until proven otherwise).
  There may also be other issues I've not contemplated. I included a couple of 
additional ideas below and am looking for comments or other suggestions that I 
have not considered.

  * Define a global counter variable initialized to 0, that gets
    incremented each time an interface name is created, to keep track
    of the last used interface name suffix. At some maximum value, the
    counter will be set back to 0.


There could be some merit to this, as it is simpler and likely faster. You would need to maintain the counter somewhere in persistent storage so it could be retrieved when libvirtd is restarted though.

  * Append a random number to 'macvlan' or 'macvtap' when creating the
    interface name. Of course, the number of digits would have to be
    limited so the interface name would not exceed the maximum allowed.


Well, that has the advantage that no persistent state information is required.

  * Create the interface name in code that has more knowledge of the
    environment and pass the name into the
    *virNetDevMacVLanCreateWithVPortProfile* function via the
    *tgifname* parameter. For example, the *qemuBuildCommandLine*
    function in *qemu_command.c* contains the loop that iterates over
    the network devices defined for the guest domain that ultimately
    get created via the *virNetDevMacVLanCreateWithVPortProfile*
    function. That function has access to the network device
    configuration and at the very least could ensure none of the names
    previously defined for the guest aren't used. I believe it would
    be matter of creating a macvtap interface name - e.g., maybe a
    call to some function in *virnetdevmacvlan.c* - and setting the
    name in the virDomainNetDef structure prior to invoking
    *qemuBuildInterfaceCommandLine*?


I don't quite follow what you're saying, but it sounds like you are suggesting that we try to know enough about the environment that we can predetermine an interface name. That won't work though - you can't know for certain that some other program hasn't taken the name you want until you try to create is.

There are shortcomings in all of these ideas, so if you have a better one, feel free to present it.

Any of the first three is better than what we currently do. Note that in the case of standard tap devices, the kernel itself handles the creation of a unique name - if you call ioctl(TUNSETIFF) with a string with "%d" in it and it finds the lowest numbered unused name and returns that. For some reason, the macvtap authors didn't want to do that.

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to