On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:53:19PM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
Martin Kletzander wrote:On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:49:52AM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: >From: Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <jas...@openbsd.org> > >Some of the protocol files already include handing of the missing int >types such as xdr_uint64_t, some don't. To fix it everywhere, move out >of the appropriate defines to internal.h and include it whenever needed. > Almost what I meant. I don't think XDR-related definitions should be in internal.h, it would then be defined everywhere. Also, protocols don't need anything from internal.h, so it doesn't make much sense to me. I would put it in a separate file.Well, as some of the protocol files were including internal.h, I hoped I would use it and also cheat a little so I didn't have to come up with a name for the new file. :-)
I understand, I wanted to suggest protocol_common.h and then removed the line because I didn't like it. Naming is the worst ;)
If that's not a proper one, I'll create a separate file for that.
Please do, we can change the name any time.
Thanks, Roman Bogorodskiy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
