On 2 February 2016 at 12:59, Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > This actually doesn't matter for the v2 vs. v3 case. The gic-version property > doesn't exist at all for v2-only QEMU. Although maybe the gic-version property > should be reworked. Instead of gic-version=<highest-supported>, we could > create > one boolean property per version supported, i.e. gicv2, gicv3, gicv4...
QEMU 2.5 released with the gic-version property, so we can't just drop it now; that would break users' command lines. We'd need a strong argument for why it's worth adding new properties that duplicate the legacy syntax. thanks - PMM -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
