On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:35:27PM +0300, Anton Protopopov wrote:
> 2009/3/27 Daniel Veillard <veill...@redhat.com>
> 
> > I would like to make a new release mid or end of next week, considering
> > the number of fixes accumulated in CVS compared to 0.6.1, I guess 0.6.2
> > makes sense.
> > I think we should look at integrating the new SCSI pool patch, hopefully
> > there is no big issues.
> > If there are mails or patchs which are pending and we forgot to review
> > or ACK, please raise them again so that we can try to get them in time
> > for next release,
> >
> 
> Here is one. This patch is a bit old now (it was obsoleted by patch from
> Florian Vichot),
> but I'm interesting if you agree with an idea. If you are, then I'll write
> new patch.

  Yup I was thinking about your patch when writing this :-)
I would have to dig again to see how much in line it is with current
practice for OpenVZ, if Evgeniy could voice his opinion that would be
more improtant than my uninformed viewpoint on this ...

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
dan...@veillard.com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to