On 03/31/2016 11:58 AM, Moshe Levi wrote:

Thanks Laine,

Adding  the driver_name o the config did the trick,  thanks J

Regarding the vifo error it seem that openstack does roleback if operation failed so that why you see the virDomainAttachDeviceFlags

Anyhow I found that the in qemu 2.1 suspend is not working (I got error [1] ) so I upgrade to qemu 2.5 and then suspend work but it failed on resume.

So Just to clarify vfio is not supporting “attach device” right? is qemu going to support it?


Not at all. attach device works just fine with vfio (that's how hotplug is done). I've just been using it myself in some testing. (note that vfio has been supported since kernel 3.6 and libvirt 1.0.5, i.e. a "very long time")


Now I wonder if I need to hardcode in the hostdev config to be with driver_name=kvm…



I certainly hope not. You would be viciously attacked by the keeper of vfio for your transgression! :-)

Seriously, there should be no reason whatsoever to force driver name='kvm'. This was made configurable *only* as a fallback in case errors were encountered with vfio during its early days. As a matter of fact, I'm pretty sure that RHEL7 has legacy kvm device assignment completely disabled. If you are needing to force legacy kvm device assignment to make your setup work, then there is a bug somewhere that needs to be investigated and squashed.



[1] -ERROR:qom/object.c:725:object_unref: assertion failed: (obj->ref > 0)

*From:*sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothinge...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Laine Stump
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:25 PM
*To:* Libvirt <libvir-list@redhat.com>
*Cc:* Moshe Levi <mosh...@mellanox.com>
*Subject:* Re: [libvirt] Host device assignment driver name vfio/ kvm

On 03/29/2016 07:45 AM, Moshe Levi wrote:

    Hi,

    I was  testing Host device assignment  in OpenStack environment
    where the driver name is vfio or kvm.

    My setup is as follow:

    1.Fedora 21

    2.Libvirt 1.3.0 which I compiled

    3.OpenStack master

    I have also other setups with older Libvirt version and the same
    OpenStack environment.

    I notice that on my fedora environment the driver name is vfio
    were in my old environment the driver name is kvm.

    According to Libvirt documentation default is "vfio" on systems
    where the VFIO driver is available and loaded, see [1]

    I remove the vfio modules by removing vfio, vfio_iommu_type1,
    vfio_pci but when I boot a vm the drive name is vfio

    How can change the driver name to be kvm?


libvirt tries very hard to use vfio rather than legacy kvm, because legacy kvm is old, deprecated, and "declared bad" :-). But it won't changed it to vfio if you've explicitly said that you want to use kvm. If you really want to use legacy kvm device assignment, manually set that in the config. When you do that, if the system you're running on doesn't support it, it will error out rather than switching.

    Another thing that I encounter is an error when suspending VM (in
    OpenStack environment)  when the driver name is  vfio.

    In such case I am getting  the following error from Libvirt:

2016-03-28 11:42:59.527 1966 ERROR oslo_messaging.rpc.dispatcher File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 560, in
    attachDeviceFlags

    2016-03-28 11:42:59.527 1966 ERROR
    oslo_messaging.rpc.dispatcher     if ret == -1: raise libvirtError
    ('virDomainAttachDeviceFlags() failed', dom=self)

    2016-03-28 11:42:59.527 1966 ERROR oslo_messaging.rpc.dispatcher
    libvirtError: internal error: unable to execute QEMU command
    'device_add': Device initialization failed.

    I would appreciate for some pointers on what can cause this issue.


Assuming that openstack uses libvirt's virDomainSave API I would expect suspending a guest to fail if it had an assigned device (since libvirt implements this by "migrating to disk", and qemu doesn't allow migration of a guest with an assigned device. But your problem is that it's trying to *attach* a device, which I wouldn't consider to be a part of a save or suspend or whatever operation. Is it possible to get more information about what leads up to this?



    [1] https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsHostDev
    <https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsHostDev>




    --

    libvir-list mailing list

    libvir-list@redhat.com <mailto:libvir-list@redhat.com>

    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to