Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 04:53:07PM -0400, David Allan wrote:
The scsi host code does not currently rescan for new LUs when refreshing
a pool. This patch causes a scan for new LUs on all targets. It does
not cause a LIP.
LIP ?
Loop Initialization Primitive, required to discover new targets on fibre
channel HBAs. Causing one to be issued is disruptive to IO on the host,
so this patch does not do that. It does mean that there is no way
through libvirt to discover new targets that have been zoned to the host
subsequent to boot.
static int
+virStorageBackendSCSIStartPool(virConnectPtr conn ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ virStoragePoolObjPtr pool ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+{
+ int retval = 0;
+
+ return retval;
+}
+
+
+static int
+virStorageBackendSCSIStopPool(virConnectPtr conn ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ virStoragePoolObjPtr pool ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+{
+ int retval = 0;
+
+ return retval;
+}
Is that really better than suggesting the operation is not supported ?
These two functions are, of course, not required for this patch.
They're there because I had started to implement NPIV support and then
thought I should submit this patch before the NPIV patch. I can take
them out if you'd like and add them to the subsequent patch where they
will have contents.
[...]
+ if (virAsprintf(&path, "/sys/class/scsi_host/host%u/scan", host) < 0) {
+ virReportOOMError(conn);
+ retval = -1;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ VIR_DEBUG(_("Scan trigger path is '%s'"), path);
+
+ fd = open(path, O_WRONLY);
+
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ virReportSystemError(conn, errno,
+ _("Could not open '%s' to trigger host scan"),
+ path);
+ retval = -1;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
+ if (write(fd,
+ LINUX_SYSFS_SCSI_HOST_SCAN_STRING,
+ sizeof(LINUX_SYSFS_SCSI_HOST_SCAN_STRING)) < 0) {
+
+ virReportSystemError(conn, errno,
+ _("Write to '%s' to trigger host scan failed"),
+ path);
+ retval = -1;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
+ goto out;
Seems to me that goto should be suppressed, it just generate a leak of path
On the other hand fd is leaked for sure ... This really need some
double-checking ;-)
Ugh, sorry about that. Fixed, thanks.
+cleanup:
+ VIR_FREE(path);
+
+out:
+ VIR_DEBUG(_("Rescan of host %d complete"), host);
+ return retval;
+}
Otherwise, sounds fine, as long as this doesn't generate a bus reset.
It doesn't generate a bus reset. As I mentioned above, this code is not
IO disruptive. I haven't decided on what I think is the right way to do
scans that are IO disruptive.
I've attached a patch with a fix for the leaks. It also adds \n to the
scan string.
Dave
>From 7f2c35b22fbce4ee28d276d870a6eacdfd207c3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Allan <dal...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:16:03 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Fix bugs per DV
Removed goto causing fd and memory leak.
Added \n to scan string.
---
src/storage_backend_scsi.c | 9 +++------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/storage_backend_scsi.c b/src/storage_backend_scsi.c
index e30b3ce..bb945dc 100644
--- a/src/storage_backend_scsi.c
+++ b/src/storage_backend_scsi.c
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ virStorageBackendSCSITriggerRescan(virConnectPtr conn,
_("Could not open '%s' to trigger host scan"),
path);
retval = -1;
- goto cleanup;
+ goto free_path;
}
if (write(fd,
@@ -535,14 +535,11 @@ virStorageBackendSCSITriggerRescan(virConnectPtr conn,
_("Write to '%s' to trigger host scan failed"),
path);
retval = -1;
- goto cleanup;
}
- goto out;
-
-cleanup:
+ close(fd);
+free_path:
VIR_FREE(path);
-
out:
VIR_DEBUG(_("Rescan of host %d complete"), host);
return retval;
--
1.6.0.6
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
