On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 02:51:26PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
We historically format runtime seclabel selinux/apparmor values, however we skip formatting runtime DAC values. This was added incommit 990e46c4542349f838e001d30638872576c389e9 Author: Marcelo Cerri <mhce...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri Aug 31 13:40:41 2012 +0200 conf: Avoid formatting auto-generated DAC labels to maintain migration compatibility with libvirt < 0.10.0. However the formatting was skipped unconditionally. Instead only skip formatting in the VIR_DOMAIN_DEF_FORMAT_MIGRATABLE case.
This all makes sense, but when I started tying it I've found it may still cause some problems. Probably. The problem is that I have no idea whether it's safer to use number or a name as the uid/gid. But since we have that parsing code in place and this patch is not about that, so we can deal with that later. ACK
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
