On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 06:39:15 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/06/2016 06:29 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:23:04 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 10:02:12 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 18:42:13 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdene...@redhat.com>
> >>>
> >>> Please explain the difference between caps_2.6.0-1.aarch64.replies
> >>> caps_2.6.0-2.aarch64.replies. At least the difference how they were
> >>> obtained.
> >>
> >> Well, I asked Andrea to provide me some data from aarch64 and ppc64le
> >> hosts :-) The difference is in GIC version supported on a two different
> >> hosts.
> > 
> > Well I kind of implied that you should put it into the commit message
> > for further reference. I don't really care at this point about the
> > difference but somebody might care in the future when touching the
> > tests.
> > 
> > 
> 
> FWIW: For example, is there a process or script (or something) somewhere
> that you use in order to generate the files?

Yes, "tests/qemucapsprobe /path/to/binary >caps.replies". It's mainly
useful for adding data files. It can be used for updating existing ones
in case you still have the binary and can just re-probe it. If you want
to add staff to existing files manually, qemucapsprobe won't help you.
But, Peter is planning to enhance the fake monitor and *.replies data
format so that you don't have to care about ids or order (to some
extent) in which you add the new replies.

Jirka

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to