On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 06:45:59PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:


On 06/15/2016 01:19 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
Regression introduced by commit 71b803a for [1] that prevents starting up
a logical pool created with <source><device path=''></source>
after it has been moved to a different physical volume.

Is there a bug for this?  XML examples?

Is an empty source device path string a valid value?  Reading
http://libvirt.org/formatstorage.html doesn't give me that impression.

I meant any pool with a <device> specified, not an empty path.

The whole point of LVM is abstraction from the lower layers so we
shouldn't ever be checking this.


"device
   Provides the source for pools backed by physical devices (pool types
fs, logical, disk, iscsi, zfs). May be repeated multiple times depending
on backend driver. Contains a required attribute path which is either
the fully qualified path to the block device node or for iscsi the iSCSI
Qualified Name (IQN). Since 0.4.1"



For logical pools <source><name> contains the name of the volume group
and uniquely identifies the VG on the host.

This also speeds up startup for pools that do not have any <device>s
specified.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025230
---
 src/storage/storage_backend_logical.c | 104 +---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)


This essentially reverts a patch that was used to resolve a bz without a
patch to resolve the issue in the bug.  What's the proposal/patch to
resolve the issue from the bug?


The issue in the bug is just cosmetic and should not block fixing this
regresion.

Jan

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to