On 06/29/2016 03:34 AM, Erik Skultety wrote: > On 27/06/16 20:28, Cole Robinson wrote: >> Similar to what virsh and virt-login-shell do >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350315 >> --- >> I can't actually reproduce the bug, the backtrace is similar to >> 97973ebb7 which added the same fix for virt-login-shell, and >> that commit also mentions the randomness of reproducing... >> >> tools/virt-admin.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/virt-admin.c b/tools/virt-admin.c >> index 4acac65..7bff5c3 100644 >> --- a/tools/virt-admin.c >> +++ b/tools/virt-admin.c >> @@ -1371,6 +1371,11 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) >> return EXIT_FAILURE; >> } >> >> + if (virInitialize() < 0) { >> + vshError(ctl, "%s", _("Failed to initialize libvirt")); >> + return EXIT_FAILURE; >> + } >> + >> virFileActivateDirOverride(argv[0]); >> >> if (!vshInit(ctl, cmdGroups, NULL)) >> > > So, based on Luyao's feedback on the modified patch I attached to > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350315, ACK if you replace > virInitialize call with virAdmInitialize (do not forget to export the > symbol through public syms :)...). I keep wondering though, why none of
I'll just give my ACK to your patch instead :) Please push that > us (you, me, and Martin) was able to reproduce it even once. > Yeah there's definitely some weirdness... see the commit message for the similar virt-login-shell change, which one day just randomly started breaking - Cole -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
