I have gotten it to compile pretty close to the end. It now fails at:

gcc -Wall -Wformat -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer- arith -Wextra -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Winline -Wredundant-decls -Wno-sign-compare -Wp,- D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -O2 - o .libs/event-test event_test-event-test.o -L/opt/local/lib ../../../ src/.libs/libvirt.dylib -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libxml2.dylib -licucore - lm /opt/local/lib/libgnutls.dylib /opt/local/lib/libtasn1.dylib -lz / opt/local/lib/libgcrypt.dylib /opt/local/lib/libgpg-error.dylib - lpthread /opt/local/lib/libintl.dylib /opt/local/lib/libiconv.dylib -lc
Undefined symbols:
  "_rpl_poll$UNIX2003", referenced from:
      _main in event_test-event-test.o
ld: symbol(s) not found
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [event-test] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2

The UNIX2003 symbol does not exist in 10.4, only in 10.5. I compiled libvirt's dependencies under 10.5, and I am compiling libvirt under 10.5, so I do not know why one of its dependencies is clearly compiled by linking to pre-10.5. The question I have is this. Where can I comment out the necessity for this symbol, and will doing so kill the libvirt remote client?

--
-a

"Ideally, a code library must be immediately usable by naive developers, easily customized by more sophisticated developers, and readily extensible by experts." -- L. Stein

On May 7, 2009, at 4:44 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:

On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:38:26AM +0200, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 11:20:10 Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 03:20:23PM -0500, Schley Andrew Kutz wrote:
Anyone? :( I really don't want to have to bring up a whole new box just do do dev work that I should be able to do from my Mac. I guess I can write against the Java bindings locally and then debug remotely on a
Linux server.

 Well, not that many people seems interested in porting to OS-X,
partly I guess because there is no support there for KVM or Xen.
I don't know what hypervisor could be used there, but for remote

VirtualBox supports Mac OS X/Solaris/Windows/etc.. so i would
try to do this, but in spare time as that is not on my todo list as of now.

 Ah, cool, thanks !

Daniel

--
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
dan...@veillard.com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/

--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to