On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 10:02 -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > 2) To assure that the actual device presented to the guest doesn't > change in the future when defaults are changed, we may want to autofill > "version" even when none is specified. (We would of course be stuck with > the unfortunate problem of what to do with existing configs)
I don't think we should worry too much about this: since we lock on a versioned machine type on guest creation, and we can assume the default virtio version will only change along with a bump in machine type version[1], we'll always present the same hardware to the guest. [1] What would be the point in versioned machine types otherwise? :) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
