On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 17:59:21 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
...
> > @@ -1127,9 +1127,13 @@ cmdCPUModelNames(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd)
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < nmodels; i++) {
> > - vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", models[i]);
> > - VIR_FREE(models[i]);
> > + if (nmodels == 0) {
> > + vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", _("all CPU models are accepted"));
> > + } else {
> > + for (i = 0; i < nmodels; i++) {
> > + vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", models[i]);
> > + VIR_FREE(models[i]);
> > + }
>
> I seem to recall some recent work around the -q[uiet] switch - is that
> something that this code needs to be concerned with? (as silly as that
> seems while I'm typing it!)
Not silly at all. I replaced vshPrint with vshPrintExtra.
Jirka
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
