On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 15:25:02 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Just like we did two commits ago, don't try to fetch capabilities
> for non-existing binary. Re-use the ones we have for running
> domain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> index 70fac56..2b24c01 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> @@ -2774,17 +2774,21 @@ qemuDomainDefAssignAddresses(virDomainDef *def,
>                               virCapsPtr caps,
>                               unsigned int parseFlags ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>                               void *opaque,
> -                             void *parseOpaque ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
> +                             void *parseOpaque)
>  {
>      virQEMUDriverPtr driver = opaque;
> -    virQEMUCapsPtr qemuCaps = NULL;
> +    virQEMUCapsPtr qemuCaps = parseOpaque;
>      int ret = -1;
>      bool newDomain = parseFlags & VIR_DOMAIN_DEF_PARSE_ABI_UPDATE;
>  
> -    if (!(qemuCaps = virQEMUCapsCacheLookup(caps,
> -                                            driver->qemuCapsCache,
> -                                            def->emulator)))
> -        goto cleanup;
> +    if (qemuCaps) {
> +        virObjectRef(qemuCaps);
> +    } else {
> +        if (!(qemuCaps = virQEMUCapsCacheLookup(caps,
> +                                                driver->qemuCapsCache,
> +                                                def->emulator)))
> +            goto cleanup;
> +    }
>  
>      if (qemuDomainAssignAddresses(def, qemuCaps, NULL, newDomain) < 0)
>          goto cleanup;

Do we really need to have a separate patch for a single change in
several functions?

ACK

Jirka

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to