On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 04:23:32PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:15 +0530, Nehal J Wani wrote:
> > 
> > Seems like the previous experiment involved a happy accident indeed.
> > 
> 
> So, what are we going to do about libvirt+dnsmasq's handling of expired
> leases now?

IMHO nothing. Once a lease has expired all bets are off, so any behaviour
is valid and you have to expect you'll get a different IP address at some
point.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-    http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to