On 10/04/2016 11:02 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Currently, osstest wrongly thinks that ARM can do save/restore,
because `virsh help' does mention the save command (on all
architectures).
Additionally, check the virth capabilities xpath
/capabilities/host/migration_features
to try to see whether this host supports migration.
I am not sure if this is the right path to check. Perhaps
/capabilities/host/migration_features/live
is more correct, but this may be wrong if Xen comes to support save/restore
on ARM, but not live migration (but perhaps libvirt cannot express this
distinction in which case perhaps it's right after all).
Looking at the capabilities generation code again, I see that
virCapabilitiesNew() takes 'offlineMigrate' and 'liveMigrate' parameters. I
assume offline in this context means save, copy, restore. Martin, is that
assumption correct?
If so, I think the saverestore_check() below can look for
/capabilities/host/migration_features. The migration check in 1/2 can look for
/capabilities/host/migration_features/live. Is it fair to assume save/restore is
available when live migration is supported?
Regards,
Jim
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>
CC: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com>
CC: Jim Fehlig <jfeh...@suse.com>
---
Osstest/Toolstack/libvirt.pm | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Osstest/Toolstack/libvirt.pm b/Osstest/Toolstack/libvirt.pm
index b7db7af..250fe47 100644
--- a/Osstest/Toolstack/libvirt.pm
+++ b/Osstest/Toolstack/libvirt.pm
@@ -111,7 +111,9 @@ sub check_for_command($$) {
sub saverestore_check ($) {
my ($self) = @_;
- return check_for_command($self, "save");
+ return
+ _check_capability($self, '/capabilities/host/migration_features') &&
+ check_for_command($self, "save");
}
sub migrate ($$$$) {
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
