Hello Daniel, Thanks for the feedback . Actually I only line wrapped those lines exceeding 80 column limit. Rest I left unchanged. I particularly sent this patch to get feedback on whether its a rule or not as HACKING file hints at it and patch reviews point at it.
Anywaz it does not make any sense now as its clear that we do not apply it strictly. Would it be wise to document this in hacking.html saying we encourage but not enforce it? Thanks, Nitesh. On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:27:21AM +0530, Nitesh Konkar wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Nitesh Konkar <nitko...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > --- > > src/libvirt-storage.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/libvirt-storage.c b/src/libvirt-storage.c > > index 48996ba..c4f2a03 100644 > > --- a/src/libvirt-storage.c > > +++ b/src/libvirt-storage.c > > @@ -233,7 +233,8 @@ virConnectNumOfDefinedStoragePools(virConnectPtr > conn) > > > > virCheckConnectReturn(conn, -1); > > > > - if (conn->storageDriver && conn->storageDriver-> > connectNumOfDefinedStoragePools) { > > + if (conn->storageDriver && > > + conn->storageDriver->connectNumOfDefinedStoragePools) { > > int ret; > > ret = conn->storageDriver->connectNumOfDefinedStoragePool > s(conn); > > if (ret < 0) > > @@ -280,7 +281,8 @@ virConnectListDefinedStoragePools(virConnectPtr > conn, > > virCheckNonNullArgGoto(names, error); > > virCheckNonNegativeArgGoto(maxnames, error); > > > > - if (conn->storageDriver && conn->storageDriver-> > connectListDefinedStoragePools) { > > + if (conn->storageDriver && > > + conn->storageDriver->connectListDefinedStoragePools) { > > int ret; > > ret = conn->storageDriver->connectListDefinedStoragePools(conn, > names, maxnames); > > if (ret < 0) > > @@ -332,7 +334,8 @@ virConnectFindStoragePoolSources(virConnectPtr conn, > > virCheckNonNullArgGoto(type, error); > > virCheckReadOnlyGoto(conn->flags, error); > > > > - if (conn->storageDriver && > > conn->storageDriver->connectFindStoragePoolSources) > { > > + if (conn->storageDriver && > > + conn->storageDriver->connectFindStoragePoolSources) { > > char *ret; > > ret = conn->storageDriver->connectFindStoragePoolSources(conn, > type, srcSpec, flags); > > if (!ret) > > @@ -485,7 +488,8 @@ virStoragePoolLookupByVolume(virStorageVolPtr vol) > > > > virCheckStorageVolReturn(vol, NULL); > > > > - if (vol->conn->storageDriver && > > vol->conn->storageDriver->storagePoolLookupByVolume) > { > > + if (vol->conn->storageDriver && > > + vol->conn->storageDriver->storagePoolLookupByVolume) { > > virStoragePoolPtr ret; > > ret = vol->conn->storageDriver->storagePoolLookupByVolume(vol); > > if (!ret) > > @@ -1188,7 +1192,8 @@ virStoragePoolNumOfVolumes(virStoragePoolPtr pool) > > > > virCheckStoragePoolReturn(pool, -1); > > > > - if (pool->conn->storageDriver && > > pool->conn->storageDriver->storagePoolNumOfVolumes) > { > > + if (pool->conn->storageDriver && > > + pool->conn->storageDriver->storagePoolNumOfVolumes) { > > int ret; > > ret = pool->conn->storageDriver->storagePoolNumOfVolumes(pool); > > if (ret < 0) > > @@ -1230,7 +1235,8 @@ virStoragePoolListVolumes(virStoragePoolPtr pool, > > virCheckNonNullArgGoto(names, error); > > virCheckNonNegativeArgGoto(maxnames, error); > > > > - if (pool->conn->storageDriver && > > pool->conn->storageDriver->storagePoolListVolumes) > { > > + if (pool->conn->storageDriver && > > + pool->conn->storageDriver->storagePoolListVolumes) { > > int ret; > > ret = pool->conn->storageDriver->storagePoolListVolumes(pool, > names, maxnames); > > if (ret < 0) > > @@ -1297,7 +1303,8 @@ virStorageVolLookupByName(virStoragePoolPtr pool, > > virCheckStoragePoolReturn(pool, NULL); > > virCheckNonNullArgGoto(name, error); > > > > - if (pool->conn->storageDriver && > > pool->conn->storageDriver->storageVolLookupByName) > { > > + if (pool->conn->storageDriver && > > + pool->conn->storageDriver->storageVolLookupByName) { > > virStorageVolPtr ret; > > ret = pool->conn->storageDriver->storageVolLookupByName(pool, > name); > > if (!ret) > > @@ -1471,7 +1478,8 @@ virStorageVolCreateXML(virStoragePoolPtr pool, > > virCheckNonNullArgGoto(xmlDesc, error); > > virCheckReadOnlyGoto(pool->conn->flags, error); > > > > - if (pool->conn->storageDriver && > > pool->conn->storageDriver->storageVolCreateXML) > { > > + if (pool->conn->storageDriver && > > + pool->conn->storageDriver->storageVolCreateXML) { > > virStorageVolPtr ret; > > ret = pool->conn->storageDriver->storageVolCreateXML(pool, > xmlDesc, flags); > > if (!ret) > > NACK this kind of change is just pointless. Further you've only line > wrapped half of the long lines in this patch context. We do *not* apply > a strict 80 character limit in libvirt. > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ > :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org > :| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ > :| >
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list