From: "Collin L. Walling" <wall...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Qemu has abandoned the +/-feature syntax in favor of key=value. Some
architectures (s390) do not support +/-feature. So we update libvirt to handle
both formats.

If we detect a sufficiently new Qemu (indicated by support for qmp
query-cpu-model-expansion) we use key=value else we fall back to +/-feature.

Signed-off-by: Collin L. Walling <wall...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjhe...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
index 4a5fce3..1f2da19 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
@@ -6580,12 +6580,18 @@ qemuBuildCpuModelArgStr(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
         switch ((virCPUFeaturePolicy) cpu->features[i].policy) {
         case VIR_CPU_FEATURE_FORCE:
         case VIR_CPU_FEATURE_REQUIRE:
-            virBufferAsprintf(buf, ",+%s", cpu->features[i].name);
+            if (virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_QUERY_CPU_MODEL_EXPANSION))
+                virBufferAsprintf(buf, ",%s=on", cpu->features[i].name);
+            else
+                virBufferAsprintf(buf, ",+%s", cpu->features[i].name);
             break;
 
         case VIR_CPU_FEATURE_DISABLE:
         case VIR_CPU_FEATURE_FORBID:
-            virBufferAsprintf(buf, ",-%s", cpu->features[i].name);
+            if (virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_QUERY_CPU_MODEL_EXPANSION))
+                virBufferAsprintf(buf, ",%s=off", cpu->features[i].name);
+            else
+                virBufferAsprintf(buf, ",-%s", cpu->features[i].name);
             break;
 
         case VIR_CPU_FEATURE_OPTIONAL:
-- 
1.9.1

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to