On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 10:25 -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
> This function is only called in two places, and the function itself is
> just adding a single argument and calling
> virDomainPCIAddressReserveNextAddr(), so we can remove it and instead
> call virDomainPCIAddressReserveNextAddr() directly.

Empty line here.

> (The main
> motivation for doing this is to free up the name so that
> qemuDomainPCIAddressReserveNextSlot() can be renamed in the next
> patch, as its current name is now inaccurate and misleading).

You can also lose the parentheses around the paragraph.


ACK

-- 
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to