On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 12:37 +1100, David Gibson wrote: > > Hm, you have a point. I'll try to see how difficult it > > would be to teach PCI devices about the quirkiness in > > bus naming when it comes to PHBs. > > An update: I'm intending to squeeze the device tree fix to advertise > extended config space into qemu-2.9. I'm not going to include the > naming change - I'll see how your investigation here turns out before > proceeding with that.
Sorry for not keeping you up to date, here's the situation: I got the code working with the current naming scheme and it's not even too big a kludge, so dropping that patch is definitely the right thing to do. Unfortunately I've uncovered a few other issues while writing more test cases, that's why I haven't yet posted a respin. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
