2017-03-30 16:06 GMT+03:00 Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com>: > Frankly, I've no idea whether this should be here. I feel like no because > VIRT_ZVAL_STRINGL should not look into the recv_buf at any position greater > than retval. That is why we give it the length of the string after all. Can > you please check whether your case still works after this line is removed?
I'm try raw images and recv_buf[retval] = '\0'; does not bring any problems (md5sum on source and dest equal with and without this). But can you look into send function in this function we convert zval to C string. As i understand leading zero dropped in this case ? -- Vasiliy Tolstov, e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
