On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:14:42AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:20:24 +0200 > Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > [*actually* added David and Drew to CC smh] > > > > On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 18:13 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > The rest looks good, but I'd like to make sure changing the > > > default is something that's okay with everyone. > > > > > > David, Drew, do you have anything against changing the > > > default USB controller model for ppc64 and aarch64 guests > > > respectively to qemu-xhci? > > No objection here. We do want to make the decision one way or another > ASAP, so QE know what to test (they've already asked about testing > nec-xhci versus qemu-xhci).
No objection, and actually the contrary. I would object to using nec-xhci on mach-virt, when the more general qemu-xhci is available. Thanks, drew -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list