On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:14:42AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:20:24 +0200
> Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > [*actually* added David and Drew to CC smh]
> > 
> > On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 18:13 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > The rest looks good, but I'd like to make sure changing the
> > > default is something that's okay with everyone.
> > > 
> > > David, Drew, do you have anything against changing the
> > > default USB controller model for ppc64 and aarch64 guests
> > > respectively to qemu-xhci?  
> 
> No objection here.  We do want to make the decision one way or another
> ASAP, so QE know what to test (they've already asked about testing
> nec-xhci versus qemu-xhci).

No objection, and actually the contrary.  I would object to using
nec-xhci on mach-virt, when the more general qemu-xhci is available.

Thanks,
drew

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to