On 18.10.2017 14:17, John Ferlan wrote:
> [...]
> 
>> So I can split this patch to 2 and clear servers hash table as you
>> suggusted instead of tossing virThreadPoolFree and add 2 extra
>> patches to make referencing at virNetDaemonAddServerPostExec straight.
>> This will take almost no time thus let's move to the other parts of the 
>> series.
>>
>> Nikolay
>>
> 
> As I said originally I wasn't considering the StateShutdown part of this
> series. Post that separately, but be sure to properly state what the
> purpose is. I think there is one sentence from the patch1 commit

Ok.

> message. It doesn't seem that it would avoid a crash on its own. When I
> first took a quick look I wondered what the difference with that new
> state was and the stateStop functionality - then I noted stateStop
> functionality in daemon/libvirtd.c was gated on WITH_DBUS, but that's
> about as far as I got to thinking about adding a new state and its
> usefulness or purpose.

stateShutdown does not really introduces a state. It just helps
to terminate state driver.

Nikolay

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to