On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 14:56 +0100, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > Here the name "pl011" is even worse than "spapr-vty". It's a device > name and there is also "pl022" (probably not supported by QEMU). The > bus name is APB (Advanced Peripheral Bus). [1] [2]
QEMU has pl031 and pl061 devices in addition to pl011, but no pl022 as far as I can tell. > How about we introduce another attribute/element that would specify the > exact model of the serial device and it would be optional, libvirt would > be able to choose the model if none is specified. That would have precedents in eg. PCI controllers, where the <model> subelement contains the hypervisor-specific device name whereas the 'model' attribute of the <controller> element contains a more generic name... You might have just convinced me :) Of course that would lead to duplicated information in the existing cases of ISA, USB and PCI, but I guess we can live with that. > I was no able to find anything about s390 and its sclp/sclplm consoles > but it's the same case. I would expect that both devices are connected > to the same BUS, we just need to find the BUS name to use it $BUS-serial > and have sclp/sclplm as models. Pino, any ideas about this? -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
