On 03/02/2018 10:13 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483816
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 52 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> index 3ef5d74e7a..54e47acd99 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> @@ -4401,12 +4401,6 @@ qemuDomainDeviceDefValidateControllerPCIOld(const 
> virDomainControllerDef *contro
>          break;
>  
>      case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_ROOT:
> -        if (pciopts->targetIndex == -1) {
> -            virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> -                           _("autogenerated pci-root options not set"));
> -            return -1;
> -        }
> -
>          /* Skip the implicit one */
>          if (pciopts->targetIndex == 0)
>              return 0;
> @@ -4645,6 +4639,52 @@ qemuDomainDeviceDefValidateControllerPCI(const 
> virDomainControllerDef *cont,
>          return -1;
>      }
>  
> +    /* targetIndex */
> +    switch ((virDomainControllerModelPCI) cont->model) {
> +    case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_ROOT:
> +        /* PHBs for pSeries guests must have been assigned a targetIndex */
> +        if (pciopts->targetIndex == -1 &&
> +            pciopts->modelName == 
> VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_PCI_MODEL_NAME_SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE) {
> +            virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> +                           _("Option '%s' not set for '%s' controller"),
> +                           "targetIndex", model);

This is the option I was talking about in the review for 03/12. As it
is, the message is going to say:

       Option 'targetIndex' not set for 'pci-root' controller

It would be better if it were something like

        Required option 'targetIndex' not set for
'spapr-pci-host-bridge' controller

(Maybe there's a way to work in 'pci-root' to the message too. It's too
late on Friday afternoon for me to try and figure it out).

Otherwise it fits with the pattern of everything else, so

Reviewed-by: Laine Stump <la...@laine.org>

> +            return -1;
> +        }
> +
> +        /* targetIndex only applies to PHBs, so for any other pci-root
> +         * controller it being present is an error */
> +        if (pciopts->targetIndex != -1 &&
> +            pciopts->modelName != 
> VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_PCI_MODEL_NAME_SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE) {
> +            virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
> +                           _("Option '%s' is not valid for '%s' controller"),
> +                           "targetIndex", model);
> +            return -1;
> +        }
> +        break;
> +
> +    case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_BRIDGE:
> +    case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_DMI_TO_PCI_BRIDGE:
> +    case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCIE_ROOT_PORT:
> +    case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCIE_SWITCH_UPSTREAM_PORT:
> +    case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCIE_SWITCH_DOWNSTREAM_PORT:
> +    case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_EXPANDER_BUS:
> +    case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCIE_EXPANDER_BUS:
> +    case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCIE_ROOT:
> +        if (pciopts->targetIndex != -1) {
> +            virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
> +                           _("Option '%s' is not valid for '%s' controller"),
> +                           "targetIndex", model);
> +            return -1;
> +        }
> +        break;
> +
> +    case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_DEFAULT:
> +    case VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_LAST:
> +    default:
> +        virReportEnumRangeError(virDomainControllerModelPCI, cont->model);
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +
>      return qemuDomainDeviceDefValidateControllerPCIOld(cont, def, qemuCaps);
>  }
>  


--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to