On 03/16/2018 09:39 AM, John Ferlan wrote:


On 03/08/2018 11:07 AM, Farhan Ali wrote:
A test case to test the virtio-gpu-ccw device.

Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <al...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
  .../qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml | 18 ++++++++++
  tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.args   | 25 ++++++++++++++
  tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml    | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
  tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c                           |  7 ++++
  .../video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml                  | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
  tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml  | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c                            | 14 ++++++++
  7 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml
  create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.args
  create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml
  create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml
  create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml


The tests look OK - could have been merged with the "functionality"
patch, but it's OK that they're separate - as long as they exist it's a
good thing.

I assume the xml2xml output would be "valid" after the "capability"
patch - if so you could extract it into it's own patch if you felt
really compelled to do so.

John


I just feel it's easier to understand to have them all in one patch :)

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to