Daniel P. Berrange wrote: ... >> Actually I did that first, but then un-did it in favor >> of the change above. Why? because that initialization could >> mask a failure to initialize in a new case. >> >> With per-case initialization, we'd detect the bug at >> compile/static-analysis time. With the up-front unconditional >> initialization, we cannot, and would have to rely on testing to find it. > > It is a tradeoff, but I still prefer the initialization at time of > declaration as a safety net, and we do use this pattern pretty much > everywhere
Ok. adjusted -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
