On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 14:40 +0400, Anton Protopopov wrote: > Also, what is the output of 'virsh capabilities' ? > <guest> > <os_type>hvm</os_type> > <arch name='x86_64'> > <wordsize>64</wordsize> > <emulator>/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64</emulator> > <machine>pc-0.11</machine> > <machine canonical='pc-0.11'>pc</machine> > <machine>pc-0.10</machine> > <machine>isapc</machine> > <domain type='qemu'> > </domain> > <domain type='kvm'> > <emulator>/usr/bin/kvm</emulator> > </domain> ... > What does 'qemu -M ?' and 'kvm -M ?' give? > # qemu -M ? > Supported machines are: > pc Standard PC (alias of pc-0.11) > pc-0.11 Standard PC (default) > pc-0.10 Standard PC, qemu 0.10 > isapc ISA-only PC > # kvm -M ? > Supported machines are: > pc Standard PC (default) > isapc ISA-only PC
Thanks, that shows the problem clearly. We need to probe the kvm binary for the machine types it supports and include it in its domain info. Please try out the four patches following Cheers, Mark. -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
