On Wed, Jul 04, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:48:56PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > Since bind() already succeeded (or will succeed) for one address, there is > > no reason to error out. Anyone who connects to an resolved ipv6 address will > > get an error, and moves on to try the resolved ipv4 address. > > libvirt is overdoing things here. > Many of the errnos reported by bind() indicate problems we should not be > ignoring IMHO. So I'd rather handle the actual errnos that indicate > non-fatal problems.
So you prefer to keep the existing behavior that all errors from bind() are fatal, even if nsocks!=0? What is the reason for that behavior? So far noone was willing to answer that question. Olaf
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
