On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 01:35:02PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 17:47:00 +0200 > Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 12.07.2018 08:32, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > > Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes:
[...] > > > Our tool to help with getting cc: wrong less often is the MAINTAINERS > > > file. Could one of the libvirt developers watch changes to qemu-doc > > > appendix "Deprecated features"? Would putting the appendix in its own > > > .texi help with that? > > > > Sound like a good idea to put the appendix in its own texi file. Then > > add an "R: libvir-list" entry for that file to MAINTAINERS and we should > > be fine (at least for the people who use the get_maintainers.pl script). > > +1, like that idea > > Are there other consumers of QEMU's interfaces which should be cc:ed in > a similar way? Perhaps starting with libvirt is fine -- as most of the open source management applications rely on it. (But if we do know other consumers, then they can be trivially added.) -- /kashyap -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
