On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 04:53 PM +0200, John Ferlan <jfer...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/03/2018 07:37 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote: >> ...since maxWorkers=0 is only intended for virtlockd or virlogd which >> must not be multithreaded. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhart...@linux.ibm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiu...@linux.ibm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <bw...@linux.ibm.com> >> --- >> src/util/virthreadpool.c | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> > > I think this is separable - this could be pushed regardless of the > outcome of patch2, right? Let me know - I can reduce the load the next > update based on patch2 comments.
Yep. Thanks for reviewing. > > Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jfer...@redhat.com> > > John > -- Beste Grüße / Kind regards Marc Hartmayer IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
