On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 11:01 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 18:52 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> [...]
> > - if (def->deviceType == VIR_DOMAIN_CHR_DEVICE_TYPE_CHANNEL &&
> > - def->targetType == VIR_DOMAIN_CHR_CHANNEL_TARGET_TYPE_GUESTFWD) {
> > - VIR_DEBUG("Ignoring device address for gustfwd channel");
> > - } else if (virDomainDeviceInfoParseXML(xmlopt, node,
> > - &def->info, flags) < 0) {
> > + if (virDomainDeviceInfoParseXML(xmlopt, node, &def->info, flags) < 0)
> > goto error;
> > - }
> > -
>
> I agree that fixing Bug 1610072 is more important than preventing
> Bug 1172526 from showing up again, but it would be great if we could
> make it so both are fixed...
>
> How about parsing the info and then clearing out the address only if
> it's a guestfwd channel? The existing virDomainDeviceInfoClear() is
> a bit too thorough, but perhaps you can introduce a new
> virDomainDeviceInfoClearAddress() that only zeroes out the address
> and use that here.
Given the issues with the approach I proposed, let's just cut our
losses and merge your original attempt instead. Sorry for wasting
your time :(
Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com>
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
