On 09/25/2018 02:03 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:30:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 09/24/2018 03:14 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
>>> Please no.
>>>
>>> Despite my comments on the first spacing rule [0], this series slows
>>> down the spacing check by 100 % (from 1.6s to 3.1s in my case).
>>
>> I don't think that syntax-check run time is our goal.
> 
> Well that's just sad.

Why is that? I spend more time trying to figure our what the code does
than running syntax-check over it. Therefore in my view code cleanliness
is more important. But if you provide some argument otherwise we can
certainly discuss it.

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to